4.6 Article

A highly accurate delta check method using deep learning for detection of sample mix-up in the clinical laboratory

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 1984-1992

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-1171

关键词

data pre-processing; deep learning; delta check; machine learning; pre-analytical error; sample mix-up

资金

  1. Major innovation support project for high-tech industries, Beijing Chaoyang District Science and Technology Plan [CYGX2112]
  2. Excellence Project of key clinical specialty in Beijing
  3. 1351 Talent Training Plan [CYMY-2017-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a highly accurate Delta check (DC) method based on deep learning to detect sample mix-up. Using 22 routine hematology test items, the Deep Belief Network (DBN) model demonstrated excellent performance on the training and validation sets, with an accuracy of 0.931 in the test set. DBN outperformed three comparator statistical methods in sample mix-up detection.
Objectives Delta check (DC) is widely used for detecting sample mix-up. Owing to the inadequate error detection and high false-positive rate, the implementation of DC in real-world settings is labor-intensive and rarely capable of absolute detection of sample mix-ups. The aim of the study was to develop a highly accurate DC method based on designed deep learning to detect sample mix-up. Methods A total of 22 routine hematology test items were adopted for the study. The hematology test results, collected from two hospital laboratories, were independently divided into training, validation, and test sets. By selecting six mainstream algorithms, the Deep Belief Network (DBN) was able to learn error-free and artificially (intentionally) mixed sample results. The model's analytical performance was evaluated using training and test sets. The model's clinical validity was evaluated by comparing it with three well-recognized statistical methods. Results When the accuracy of our model in the training set reached 0.931 at the 22nd epoch, the corresponding accuracy in the validation set was equal to 0.922. The loss values for the training and validation sets showed a similar (change) trend over time. The accuracy in the test set was 0.931 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.977. DBN demonstrated better performance than the three comparator statistical methods. The accuracy of DBN and revised weighted delta check (RwCDI) was 0.931 and 0.909, respectively. DBN performed significantly better than RCV and EDC. Of all test items, the absolute difference of DC yielded higher accuracy than the relative difference for all methods. Conclusions The findings indicate that input of a group of hematology test items provides more comprehensive information for the accurate detection of sample mix-up by machine learning (ML) when compared with a single test item input method. The DC method based on DBN demonstrated highly effective sample mix-up identification performance in real-world clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据