4.7 Article

Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 697-707

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3231

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Austrian National Bank [16971]
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  3. Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
  4. Swedish Cancer Society [19-0306]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2017-01392]
  6. Swedish government [716321]
  7. Sweden's Innovation Agency
  8. Swedish Research Council [2017-01392] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  9. Formas [2017-01392] Funding Source: Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection and persistence of ctDNA in plasma can predict the response to neoadjuvant treatment and identify patients who will not achieve complete pathological response or be classified with residual cancer burden II/III.
Purpose: Accurate response assessment during neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) poses a clinical challenge. Therefore, a minimally invasive assessment of tumor response based on cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be beneficial to guide treat-ment decisions. Experimental Design: We profiled 93 genes in tissue from 193 patients with early breast cancer. Patient-specific assays were designed for 145 patients to track ctDNA during NST in plasma. ctDNA presence and levels were correlated with complete patho-logical response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) as well as clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor to identify potential proxies for ctDNA release. Results: At baseline, ctDNA could be detected in 63/145 (43.4%) patients and persisted in 25/63 (39.7%) patients at mid-therapy (MT) and 15/63 (23.8%) patients at the end of treatment. ctDNA detection at MT was significantly associated with higher RCB (OR = 0.062; 95% CI, 0.01-0.48; P = 0.0077). Of 31 patients with detectable ctDNA at MT, 30 patients (96.8%) were nonrespon-ders (RCB II, n = 8; RCB III, n = 22) and only one patient responded to the treatment (RCB I). Considering all 145 patients with baseline (BL) plasma, none of the patients with RCB 0 and only 6.7% of patients with RCB I had ctDNA detectable at MT, whereas 30.6% and 29.6% of patients with RCB II/III, respec-tively, had a positive ctDNA result. Conclusions: Overall, our results demonstrate that the detection and persistence of ctDNA at MT may have the potential to negatively predict response to neoadjuvant treatment and identify patients who will not achieve pCR or be classified with RCB II/III.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据