4.5 Article

Construction sector views on low carbon building materials

期刊

BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 423-444

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872

关键词

embodied carbon; construction sector; CO2 reduction; market acceptance; alternative materials; professional knowledge; greenhouse gas emissions

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G036608/1]
  2. RCUK Energy Programme [EP/K011774/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K011774/1, EP/N022645/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N022645/1, 1092684] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As is the case in a number of countries, the UK construction industry faces the challenge of expanding production whilst making ambitious greenhouse gas emission reductions. Embodied carbon constitutes a growing proportion of whole-life carbon emissions and accounts for a significant share of total UK emissions. A key mitigation strategy is increasing the use of alternative materials with lower embodied carbon. The economic, technical, practical and cultural barriers to the uptake of these alternatives are explored through a survey of construction professionals and interviews with industry leaders. Perceptions of high cost, ineffective allocation of responsibility, industry culture, and the poor availability of product and building-level carbon data and benchmarks constitute significant barriers. Opportunities to overcome these barriers include earlier engagement of professionals along the supply chain, effective use of whole-life costing, and changes to contract and tender documents. A mounting business case exists for addressing embodied carbon, but has yet to be effectively disseminated. In the meantime, the moral convictions of individual clients and practitioners have driven early progress. However, this research underscores the need for new regulatory drivers to complement changing attitudes if embodied carbon is to be established as a mainstream construction industry concern.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据