4.6 Article

Impact of resolution on the atmosphere-ocean coupling along the Gulf Stream in global high resolution models

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 58, 期 11-12, 页码 3317-3333

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-021-06098-9

关键词

Air-sea interaction; Mesoscale coupling; Gulf Stream; Vertical mixing mechanism (VMM); Pressure adjustment mechanism (PAM)

资金

  1. European Commission [641727]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the resolution dependence of ocean-atmosphere coupling along the Gulf Stream using six Global Climate Models. It explores two interaction mechanisms and finds that increasing resolution leads to stronger coupling and better agreement with observations.
We have investigated the horizontal resolution dependence of the ocean-atmosphere coupling along the Gulf Stream, of simulations made by six Global Climate Models according to the HighResMIP protocol, and compared it with reanalysis and remote sensing observations. Two ocean-atmosphere interaction mechanisms are explored in detail: The Vertical Mixing Mechanism (VMM) associated with the intensification of downward momentum transfer, and the Pressure Adjustment Mechanism (PAM) associated with secondary circulations driven by pressure gradients. Both VMM and PAM are found to be active even in the eddy-parameterized models. However, increasing ocean and/or atmosphere resolution leads to enhanced ocean-atmosphere coupling and improved agreement with reanalysis and observations. Our results indicate that while one part of the stronger air-sea coupling is attributable to the refinement of the oceanic component to eddy-permitting, optimal results are obtained only by further increase of the atmosphere resolution too. The use of the eddy-resolving model show weaker or same coupling strength over the eddy-permitting resolution. We conclude that at least eddy-permiting ocean resolution and comparable atmosphere resolution are required for a reliable ocean-atmosphere coupling along the Gulf Stream.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据