4.7 Article

Arrhythmias in Female Patients: Incidence, Presentation and Management

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 474-495

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319893

关键词

female; humans; incidence; male; sex characteristics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review highlights the importance of recognizing gender differences in cardiovascular conditions and emphasizes the need to establish stronger clinical evidence for female treatment. It discusses known or suggested gender differences in arrhythmia care, aiming to optimize care for female patients. Recommendations for improving female enrollment in clinical trials and areas for future research in optimizing arrhythmia care are also provided.
There is a growing appreciation for differences in epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of cardiovascular conditions by sex. Historically, cardiovascular clinical trials have under-represented females, but findings have nonetheless been applied to clinical care in a sex-agnostic manner. Thus, much of the collective knowledge about sex-specific cardiovascular outcomes result from post hoc and secondary analyses. In some cases, these investigations have revealed important sex-based differences with implications for optimizing care for female patients with arrhythmias. This review explores the available evidence related to cardiac arrhythmia care among females, with emphasis on areas in which important sex differences are known or suggested. Considerations related to improving female enrollment in clinical trials as a way to establish more robust clinical evidence for the treatment of females are discussed. Areas of remaining evidence gaps are provided, and recommendations for areas of future research and specific action items are suggested. The overarching goal is to improve appreciation for sex-based differences in cardiac arrhythmia care as 1 component of a comprehensive plan to optimize arrhythmia care for all patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据