4.4 Article

A High-Temperature Superconducting Maglev Ring Test Line Developed in Chengdu, China

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2016.2555921

关键词

Bulk high-temperature superconductors (HTSCs); Maglev; multiparameter real-time monitoring; permanent-magnet guideway (PMG); sectional propulsion; test line

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51307147, 51375404]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWJTU11ZT34, 2682014ZT25, 2682015ZD01]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University [2012TPL_Z01, 2013TPL_Z04, 2014TPL_Z02, 2016TPL_T01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 45-m-long high-temperature superconducting (HTS) Maglev ring test line, named Super-Maglev, has been successfully developed in Chengdu, China, in February 2013, 12 years after the birth of the first man-loading HTS Maglev test vehicle. The Maglev vehicle (2.2 m in length, 1.1 m in width) is designed for one passenger with a levitation height of 10-20 mm; the permanent-magnet guideway (PMG) (45 m in length, 0.77 m of track gauge) is a racetrack shape with a curve radius of 6 m; the driving is accomplished by a linear induction motor with a maximum running speed of 50 km/h. The linear motor is composed of four submotors installed at one straight section in the middle of the double PMGs, and the total length is 3 m. This second-generation HTS Maglev vehicle system is highlighted by the cost-performance and the wireless multiparameter onboard monitoring function. The current same-level load capability has been achieved over a small-section low-cost PMG whose cross-sectional area is only 3000 mm(2). On the vehicle, parameters of levitation weight, levitation height, running speed, acceleration, lateral offset, online position, and total running distance of the vehicle are real-time monitored and displayed on the onboard tablet computer. The system component and test data are reported in detail in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据