4.5 Article

High T c Superconductivity in Heavy Rare Earth Hydrides

期刊

CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/38/10/107401

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12122405, 51632002, 11974133]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in Universities [IRT 15R23]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P022596/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, carbonaceous sulfur hydride was found to exhibit room temperature superconductivity under high pressure. The authors theoretically identified two sodalite-type clathrate hydrides, YbH6 and LuH6, which may have high superconducting critical temperatures at lower pressures. This is attributed to the electron-phonon coupling enhancement due to the presence of filled f-shells in the YbH6 and LuH6 compounds.
Sulfur and lanthanum hydrides under compression display superconducting states with high observed critical temperatures. It has been recently demonstrated that carbonaceous sulfur hydride displays room temperature superconductivity. However, this phenomenon has been observed only at very high pressure. Here, we theoretically search for superconductors with very high critical temperatures, but at much lower pressures. We describe two of such sodalite-type clathrate hydrides, YbH6 and LuH6. These hydrides are metastable and are predicted to superconduct with T (c) similar to 145 K at 70 GPa and T (c) similar to 273 K at 100 GPa, respectively. This striking result is a consequence of the strong interrelationship between the f states present at the Fermi level, structural stability, and the final T (c) value. For example, TmH6, with unfilled 4f orbitals, is stable at 50 GPa, but has a relatively low value of T (c) of 25 K. The YbH6 and LuH6 compounds, with their filled f-shells, exhibit prominent phonon softening, which leads to a strong electron-phonon coupling, and as a result, an increase in T (c).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据