4.7 Article

Microwave-assisted synthesis of oxygen vacancy associated TiO2 for efficient photocatalytic nitrate reduction

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 3835-3841

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.025

关键词

Photocatalysis; TiO2; Oxygen vacancy; Nitrate reduction

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFA0211004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876112, 21876113, 22022608, 92034301]
  3. 111 InnovationandTalentRecruitment Base on Photochemical and Energy Materials [D18020]
  4. Ministry of Education
  5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Functional Materials, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Green Energy Chemical Engineering [18DZ2254200]
  6. Shanghai government [18SG41, 309-AC9103-21-413002, 19YF1436600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A low-cost photocatalyst, rutile and anatase mixed phase TiO2, was synthesized using a facile microwave-hydrothermal method, with oxygen vacancy generated for improved adsorption and reduction activity towards nitrate pollutants.
The solar-driven photocatalytic technology has shown great potential in nitrate (NO3-) pollutants reduction, however, it has been greatly hindered by the complex preparation and high cost of photocatalysts. Herein, a relatively low-cost photocatalyst, rutile and anatase mixed phase TiO2 was synthesized by a facile microwave-hydrothermal method. Meanwhile, oxygen vacancy is successfully generated, leading to an acidic surface for strong adsorption towards NO3-, which further improved the reduction activity. Compared with the commercial P25, a higher NO3- conversion of ca. 100% and nitrogen (N-2) selectivity of 87% were achieved under UV (365 nm) irradiation within 2 h. This research provides a promising strategy for designing efficient noble metal free photocatalyst in the NO3- reduction. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据