4.7 Article

Two-dimensional covalent organic framework nanosheets: Synthesis and energy-related applications

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 2867-2882

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.060

关键词

Covalent organic framework nanosheets; Top-down method; Bottom-up method; Batteries; Photocatalysts; Electrocatalysts

资金

  1. Class D of Qianjiang Talent Program [ZD20 011250001]
  2. Zhejiang University of Technology [2019125016829]
  3. Leading Innovative and Entrepreneur Team Introduction Program of Zhejiang [2020R01002]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51907173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional covalent organic framework nanosheets are attracting research attention due to their unique properties with great potential in energy-related applications. They provide high transport pathways for charge carriers through two typical synthetic methods. Future research will face challenges and opportunities.
Two-dimensional (2D) covalent organic framework nanosheets (CONs) are attracting increasing research attention because of their unique properties derived from their ultrathin thickness, high surface-to-volume atomic ratio, and extremely large surface area. 2D CONs can provide high transport pathways for charge carriers (e.g., electrons, holes and ions) through either the conjugated skeletons or the open channels. Therefore, they have shown great potential in energy related applications. In this review, we firstly introduce the recent developments and characteristics of 2D CONs by focusing on the two typical synthetic methods, i.e., top-down and bottom-up methods. Then, the energy-related applications in energy storage and conversion of 2D CONs are summarized. Finally, we give our personal views on the challenges and perspectives for the future research of 2D CONs and their composites. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据