4.7 Article

Photoluminescent chiral carbon dots derived from glutamine

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 3916-3920

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.021

关键词

Chirality; Carbon dots; Photoluminescence; Circular dichroism; Sensors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21621001]
  2. 111 Project [B17020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a hydrothermal method to fabricate chiral CDs using amino acid enantiomers as precursors, resulting in CDs with excitation-dependent blue fluorescence and opposite optical rotation in solutions modulated by concentrations of CDs. Time-dependent density functional calculation suggests the presence of polypeptides on the surface of CDs, contributing to the optical activity originating from the stacking of neighboring carbonyl groups.
The integration of luminescence and chirality in carbon dots (CDs) encourages candidates to explore novel functions and applications of CDs, however, the preparation of chiral CDs is very limited. Herein, we report a hydrothermal method to fabricate chiral CDs by utilizing amino acid enantiomers as the precursors. LGln-CDs or DGln-CDs with uniform size of 3-4 nm show excitation-dependent blue fluorescence in solutions. Circular dichroism measurement confirms the opposite optical rotation of chiral CDs in the region from 200 nm to 300 nm, and the signals can be regulated by concentrations of CDs solution. Time-dependent density functional calculation reveals that polypeptides may exist on the surface of CDs due to the polycondensation of L/DGln at high temperature, and the optical activity of CDs originates from the stacking of neighboring carbonyl groups. The facile synthetic methodology proposed will provide potential opportunities for the preparation and application of chiral and chiroptical CDs-based materials. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据