4.7 Article

Tetracycline sensitizes TiO2 for visible light photocatalytic degradation via ligand-to-metal charge transfer

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 5218-5222

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.067

关键词

Ligand-to-metal charge transfer sensitization; Tetracycline; TiO2; Photocatalytic degradation; Antibiotic resistance gene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777116]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. College of Environmental Science and Engineering of Tongji University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that tetracycline can effectively sensitize pure TiO2 for visible light photocatalytic degradation through a charge transfer mechanism. The intermediate degradation products of tetracycline show reduced bactericidal effects and less induction of antibiotic-resistance genes. This study demonstrates an effective method for treating antibiotics-contaminated wastewater using TiO2.
Treatment of antibiotics contaminated water remains a global environmental challenge. In this study, tetracycline (TC) was found to effectively sensitize pure TiO2 for visible light photocatalytic degradation via a ligand-to-metal charge transfer mechanism. The sensitization was attributed to the formation of TC-TiO2 complex and the overlap of the molecular orbitals of TC and the conduction band of TiO2. The intermediate degradation products of TC, however, did not sensitize TiO2, which was the reason for the low mineralization rate. Nevertheless, our results showed that the intermediate degradation products of TC had significantly reduced bactericidal effects and less induction of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs). This study showcases an effective treatment of antibiotics-containing wastewater using the most common photocatalyst TiO2 with reduced risk in the spread of ARGs. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据