4.7 Article

Influence of the alkyl side chain length on the room-temperature phosphorescence of organic copolymers

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 2965-2968

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.097

关键词

Room-temperature phosphorescence; Alkyl chain length; Conjugated structure; Amorphous polymer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21788102, 22125803, 22020102006, 21871083]
  2. Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [20XD1421300]
  3. 'Shu Guang' Project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  4. Shanghai Education Development Foundation [19SG26]
  5. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2017-01-07-00-02-E00010]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pure organic room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) materials have been achieved by copolymerizing iminostilbene and its analogues with acrylamide. The study shows that the growth of alkane chain in monomers enhances the lifetime and photoluminescence quantum yield of RTP emission, and polymers with larger conjugated structures exhibit longer RTP emission wavelengths.
Pure organic room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) materials have attracted wide attention owing to their excellent luminescent properties and great potential in various applications. In this work, iminostilbene and its analogues are applied to realize RTP emission by copolymerizing with acrylamide. It can be concluded that the growth of alkane chain in monomers can enhance the lifetime and photoluminescence quantum yield of RTP emission, and polymers with the larger conjugated structure of the monomer show a longer RTP emission wavelength. This work provides a series of new pure organic RTP materials and might provide new thoughts for designing more advanced and superior RTP materials. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据