4.8 Article

Ni-Fe Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets Supported on Exfoliated Graphite for Efficient Urea Oxidation in Direct Urea Fuel Cells

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202102614

关键词

direct urea fuel cell; energy storage; exfoliated graphite; layered double hydroxide; oxidation

资金

  1. CRCG grant of The University of Hong Kong [201910160008]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51768019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, exfoliated graphite was obtained by microwave irradiation and used as a support for nickel-iron layered double hydroxide to create an efficient and low-cost urea oxidation catalyst. The catalyst showed excellent performance and stability in a dual-electrolyte direct urea fuel cell.
Urea-rich wastewater can cause serious eutrophication problem to the water environment. On the other hand, urea is a potential fuel with high energy density, which can be effectively utilized by direct urea fuel cell. In this work, exfoliated graphite (EG) with high surface area and electrical conductivity was obtained by microwave irradiation, which was used to support the Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide (LDH), leading to a highly efficient and low-cost urea oxidation catalyst. Compared with commercial RuO2, the as-prepared Ni-Fe LDH/EG exhibited a lower onset potential of 1.25 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode as well as a lower Tafel slope of 44 mV dec(-1). The catalyst durability was also proved to be excellent. The optimized Ni/Fe molar ratio was confirmed to be 3 : 1, while the most suitable catalyst/EG ratio was 3 : 50. When applied in a dual-electrolyte direct urea fuel cell, the peak power density reached 12 mW cm(-2), and the long-term discharge was also stable with negligible voltage loss at 10 mA cm(-2) for 3 h. Such a low-cost and efficient urea oxidation catalyst can be widely utilized in future direct urea fuel cells, which achieve wastewater treatment and renewable electricity generation at the same time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据