4.5 Article

Theoretical and X-ray Evidence of Electrostatic Phosphonium anti and gauche Effects

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202100856

关键词

conformational analysis; gauche effect; anti effect; organophosphorus compounds; electrostatic interactions

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) [CEX-APQ-00383/15]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [001]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the conformation and stability of six-membered rings containing an endocyclic phosphorus atom and a beta-fluorine substituent. It was found that some oxidized forms exhibit surprising stability in the sterically disfavored axial orientation. Different oxidized forms of sulfur compounds show variation in electrostatic interaction with fluorine and preference for arrangement.
Sulphur, not phosphorus, is the only known third-row element capable of experiencing an electrostatic gauche effect with fluorine. Some six-membered rings containing an endocyclic phosphorus atom and a beta-fluorine substituent that can interconvert to axial (gauche relative to phosphorus) and equatorial positions were then analysed. While phosphines do not establish an electrostatic attraction between fluorine and phosphorus, some oxidised forms exhibit surprising stability for the sterically disfavoured axial orientation. Because the nature of this behaviour was not obvious, since an intramolecular hydrogen bond can appear, a phosphonium derivative was further studied and its axial conformation was found to be highly stable. A preference for the gauche arrangement appears even for the acyclic and sterically hindered (2-fluoroethyl)triphenylphosphonium cation. On the other hand, (ethane-1,2-diyl)bis(phosphonium) cations are exclusively in anti conformation due to an (+/+)-electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged phosphonium groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据