4.7 Article

Demulsification of water-in-crude oil emulsion driven by a carbonaceous demulsifier from natural rice husks

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132656

关键词

Rice husks; Carbon; Demulsification; W; O emulsion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The environmentally friendly and amphipathic rice husk carbon (RHC) demulsifier prepared in this study showed high efficiency in removing emulsified water from water-in-crude oil emulsion. With 600 mg/L of RHC at 70 degrees C, the dehydration efficiency reached as high as 96.99%, demonstrating its effectiveness under neutral conditions.
Removing emulsified water from a water-in-crude oil (W/O) emulsion is critically required prior to downstream processing in the petroleum industry. In this work, environmentally friendly and amphipathic rice husk carbon (RHC) demulsifier was prepared by a simple carbonization process in a muffle furnace using rice husks as starting materials. RHC was characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive spectrometer, Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, ultraviolet-visible spectrometer, powder X-ray diffraction, zeta potential and synchronal thermal analyzer. The factors such as dosage, temperature, settling time, pH value and salinity were systematically investigated. The results indicated that the dehydration efficiency (DE) reached as high as 96.99% with 600 mg/L of RHC for 80 min at 70 degrees C. RHC exhibited an optimal DE under neutral condition, but it was also effective under acidic and alkaline conditions. Also, it had an excellent salt tolerance. The possible demulsification mechanism was explored by interfacial properties, different treatment methods for RHC and microexamination. The demulsification of RHC is attributed to its high interfacial activity, oxygencontaining groups and content of silica. It indicates that RHC is an effective demulsifier for the treatment of the W/O emulsion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据