4.7 Article

Excellent photocatalytic performances of Co3O4-AC nanocomposites for H2 production via wastewater splitting

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131823

关键词

Co3O4; Activated carbon; Nanocomposites; Photocatalysts; Hydrogen production

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea through the basic science research programs [2016R1A6A1A03012877, 2019R1A2C1085448]
  2. Korean Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis and characterization of biomass activated carbon-decorated cobalt oxide nanocomposites for solar-stimulated photocatalytic hydrogen production from sulphide wastewater is reported. The nanocomposites showed enhanced hydrogen production efficiency under solar irradiance, indicating great potential for green photocatalytic wastewater splitting.
Natural sunlight-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production from wastewater is one of the most desirable techniques that can realize future green energy technology. Herein, we report the synthesis and the character-ization of the biomass activated carbon (AC)-decorated cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanocomposites for solar-stimulated photocatalytic hydrogen production from sulphide wastewater. The Co3O4-AC nanocomposites were ultrasoni-cally synthesized by using hydrothermally-grown spinel Co3O4 nanoflakes and biomass-derived AC nanoflakes. Co3O4-AC showed a nanobundle-like aggregated morphology, and exhibited a large specific surface area (-133 m(2)/g). Through utilizing Co3O4-AC as a photocatalyst for photocatalytic splitting of sulphide wastewater (0.2 M) under solar irradiance with 730 W/m(2), an enhanced H-2 production efficiency (-70 mL/h) was achieved owing to the synergic effects from 2-dimentionally configured Co3O4 and AC microstructures; i.e., large surface area of Co3O4 and high electrical conductivity of AC. These findings suggest the nanocomposites of Co3O4-AC to hold great promise for the green approach of photocatalytic wastewater splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据