4.7 Article

New insights into the sorption of U(VI) on kaolinite and illite in the presence of Aspergillus niger

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132497

关键词

Uranium; Sorption; Bio-composites; Clay minerals; Mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21906073, 21876172]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS, Gansu Talent and Intelligence Center for Remediation of Closed and Old Deposits
  3. Key Laboratory Project of Gansu Province [1309RTSA041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulation effect of Aspergillus niger on the sorption behavior of U(VI) on kaolinite and illite was studied, showing that only inner-sphere complexes were present on the biocomposites. Microspectroscopy tests revealed coordination of U(VI) with phosphate, amide, and carboxyl groups on the biocomposites, while XPS found partial reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) in the presence of A. niger.
The regulation effect of Aspergillus niger to the sorption behavior of U(VI) on kaolinite and illite was studied through investigating the enrichment of U(VI) on kaolinite-Aspergillus niger and illite-Aspergillus niger composites. Kaolinite-or illite-A. niger composites were prepared through co-culturation method. Results showed that U(VI) sorption on kaolinite and illite in different pH ranges could be attributed to ion exchange, outer-sphere complexes (OSCs), and inner-sphere complexes (ISCs), while only the ISCs on the bio-composites. Moreover, micro spectroscopy tests revealed that U(VI) coordinate with phosphate, amide, and carboxyl groups on illite-and kaolinite-A. niger composites. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) further found that U(VI) was partly reduced to non-crystalline U(IV) by A. niger in the bio-composites, occurring as phosphate coordination polymers or biomass-associated monomers. The findings herein provide further insight into the immobilization and migration of uranium in environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据