4.7 Review

Removal of organic pollutants from aqueous solution using metal organic frameworks (MOFs)-based adsorbents: A review

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131393

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs); Adsorption; Organic pollutants; Interaction mechanisms

资金

  1. Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [51778230]
  2. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [17QA1401000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MOFs have unique properties that make them suitable for adsorptive removal of harmful organic pollutants from aqueous solution. While the introduction of functional groups and other external materials can enhance the performance of MOFs, it also increases manufacturing costs, posing a challenge for large-scale applications.
The development of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) has recently drawn a lot of scientific interest in water treatment due to the unique properties such as tunable porosities, large pore volumes, hierarchical structures, excellent adsorption and regeneration performances. MOFs represent an eco-friendly alternative to conventional adsorbents especially for the adsorptive removal of noxious organic pollutants from aqueous solution. Advanced MOFs' performances are justified by the introduction of functional groups, magnetic moieties, and specific foreign materials onto MOFs. This however leads to increase in the manufacturing costs of MOFs and consequently possess a huge challenge in large-scale applications. This review hence critically discusses the recent progresses in the development of MOFs-based adsorbents for the removal of selected organic pollutants (e.g., dyes, antibiotics and pesticides) from aqueous solution. Furthermore, major interaction mechanisms between MOFs and organic pollutants in response to numerous experimental conditions, such as pH, temperature, coexisting ions are put forward. Finally, some recommendations in support for designing MOFs with improved adsorption performances are also highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据