4.7 Review

Removal of pharmaceuticals from water using sewage sludge-derived biochar: A review

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133196

关键词

Sludge treatment; Biochar; Water treatment; Adsorption; Pharmaceuticals; Sewage sludge biochar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review critically evaluates the recent progress in applications of sludge-based biochar for the adsorption of pharmaceuticals from water, highlighting its excellent potential for the removal of numerous pharmaceuticals. The effects of synthesis techniques of biochar production from sludge on the physicochemical characteristics of produced biochar and their adsorption performance are discussed, with a focus on reusability.
In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to the beneficial utilization of sewage sludge to reduce the risks associated with sludge disposal. Besides other applications of sludge, biochar produced from sludge has also been employed for the elimination of various pollutants from water. This review critically evaluates the recent progress in applications of sludge-based biochar for the adsorption of pharmaceuticals from water. The synthesis techniques of biochar production from sludge and their effects on physicochemical characteristics of produced biochar are discussed. The removal of various pharmaceuticals by sludge-based biochar are described in detail, with the emphasis on the adsorption mechanism and their reusability potential. It is evident from the literature that sludge-based biochar has demonstrated excellent potential for the adsorption of numerous pharmaceuticals from the aqueous phase. The major hurdles and issues related to the synthesis of sludge-based biochar and applications are highlighted, with reference to the adsorption of pharmaceuticals. Finally, a roadmap is suggested along with future research directions to ensure the sustainable production of biochar from sludge and its applications in water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据