4.7 Article

High-performance carbon black electrode for oxygen reduction reaction and oxidation of atrazine by electro-Fenton process

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132370

关键词

Atrazine; Hydrogen peroxide; Electro-oxidation; Electro-fenton; Carbon black

资金

  1. Kocaeli University scientific research project (BAP) [FMP-2019-1548]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to produce an electrode for H2O2 production and Electro-Fenton process using an effective, cheap, and simple method. The superhydrophobic electrode demonstrated high performance in H2O2 production and Atrazine mineralization under optimized operational conditions. The electrode stability and catalytic effects were also evaluated, showcasing its potential for practical applications.
The aim of this study is to produce an electrode that can be used in H2O2 production and Electro-Fenton (EF) process by an effective, cheap, and easy method. For this reason, a superhydrophobic electrode with a higher PTFE ratio and high thickness was produced with a simple press. The produced electrode was used in the production of H2O2 and mineralization of Atrazine. First, the effect of pH, cathode voltage, and operation time on H2O2 production was evaluated. The maximum H2O2 concentration (409 mg/L), the highest current efficiency (99.80%), and the lowest electrical energy consumption (3.16 kWh/kg) were obtained at 0.8 V, 7.0 of pH, and 120 min, and the stability of the electrode was evaluated up to 720 min. Then, the effects of the operational conditions (pH, cathode voltage, operating time, and catalyst concentration) in electro-Fenton were evaluated. The fastest degradation of Atrazine (>99%) was obtained at 2.0 V, 3.0 of pH, and 0.3 mM of Fe2+ in 15 min. In the final part of the study, the degradation intermediates were identified, and the characterization of the electrode was evaluated by SEM, XRD, FT-IR, tensiometer, potentiostat, and elemental analyzer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据