4.6 Article

Low-Valent Titanium Species Stabilized with Aluminum/Boron Hydride Fragments

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202103085

关键词

aluminum; boron; density functional calculations; reduction; titanium

资金

  1. Spanish MCIU [PGC2018-094007-B-I00, PGC2018-093863-B-C21]
  2. Universidad de Alcala [CCG20/CC-007]
  3. Spanish Structures of Excellence Maria de Maeztu program [MDM-2017-0767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-valent titanium species were prepared by reacting [TiCp*X-3] with LiEH4 or BH3(thf), and their structures were elucidated using experimental and theoretical methods. The compounds can be described as either titanium(II) or titanium(III) species, with specific molecular structures and interactions between the Ti-Ti bond and the Al atoms.
Low-valent titanium species were prepared by reaction of [TiCp*X-3] (Cp*=eta(5)-C5Me5; X=Cl, Br, Me) with LiEH4 (E=Al, B) or BH3(thf), and their structures elucidated by experimental and theoretical methods. The treatment of trihalides [TiCp*X-3] with LiAlH4 in ethereal solvents (L) leads to the hydride-bridged heterometallic complexes [{TiCp*(mu-H)}(2){(mu-H)(2)AlX(L)}(2)] (L=thf, X=Cl, Br; L=OEt2, X=Cl). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations for those compounds reveal an open-shell singlet ground state with a Ti-Ti bond and can be described as titanium(II) species. The theoretical analyses also show strong interactions between the Ti-Ti bond and the empty s orbitals of the Al atom of the AlH2XL fragments, which behave as sigma-accepting (Z-type) ligands. Analogous reactions of [TiCp*X-3] with LiBH4 (2 and 3 equiv.) in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature and at 85 degrees C lead to the titanium(III) compounds [{TiCp*(BH4)(mu-X)}(2)] (X=Cl, Br) and [{TiCp*(BH4)(mu-BH4)}(2)], respectively. The treatment of [TiCp*Me-3] with 4 and 5 equiv. of BH3(thf) produces the diamagnetic [{TiCp*(BH3Me)}(2)(mu-B2H6)] and paramagnetic [{TiCp*(mu-B2H6)}(2)] complexes, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据