4.6 Article

Synthetic Antibody-Rhamnose Cluster Conjugates Show Potent Complement-Dependent Cell Killing by Recruiting Natural Antibodies

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202200146

关键词

anti-Rha antibody; antibody conjugates; chemoenzymatic synthesis; glycoengineering; immunotherapy

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 AI155716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclonal antibodies are rapidly growing in use for cancer, infectious, and autoimmune disease treatment. A chemoenzymatic synthesis method was developed to create structurally well-defined conjugates of antibodies with rhamnose and alpha Gal trisaccharide clusters, enhancing targeted cell killing through CDC. These antibody-rhamnose cluster conjugates showed potent CDC activity for cancer cell killing compared to the antibody-alpha Gal trisaccharide cluster conjugates.
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are one of the most rapidly growing drug classes used for the treatment of cancer, infectious and autoimmune diseases. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) is one of the effector functions for antibodies to deplete target cells. We report here an efficient chemoenzymatic synthesis of structurally well-defined conjugates of a monoclonal antibody with a rhamnose- and an alpha Gal trisaccharide-cluster to recruit natural anti-rhamnose and anti-alpha Gal antibodies, respectively, to enhance the CDC-dependent targeted cell killing. The synthesis was achieved by using a modular antibody Fc-glycan remodeling method that includes site-specific chemoenzymatic Fc-glycan functionalization and subsequent click conjugation of synthetic rhamnose- and alpha Gal trisaccharide-cluster to provide the respective homogeneous antibody conjugates. Cell-based assays indicated that the antibody-rhamnose cluster conjugates could mediate potent CDC activity for targeted cancer cell killing and showed much more potent efficacy than the antibody-alpha Gal trisaccharide cluster conjugates for CDC effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据