4.8 Article

Introducing Electron-Withdrawing Linking Units and Thiophene π-Bridges into Polymerized Small Molecule Acceptors for High-Efficiency All-Polymer Solar Cells

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 21, 页码 8212-8222

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02302

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China - MOST [2019YFA0705900]
  2. NSFC [51820105003, 21734008, 61904181]
  3. Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Research [2019B030302007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that introducing weak electron-withdrawing A-units and thiophene pi-bridges can enhance the performance of all-polymer solar cells by synthesizing a series of narrow bandgap polymer acceptors.
A series of narrow bandgap polymer acceptors (PY5-BTZ, PY5-2TZ, PY5-PZ, and PY5-BT) were synthesized by copolymerizing a Y5-like small molecule acceptor (SMA) and different electron-withdrawing (A) units with thiophene pi-bridges. Among the polymerized SMAs (PSMAs), the A-unit is bifluorobenzotriazole for PY5-BTZ, thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole for PY5-2TZ, pyrazine for PY5-PZ, and benzothiadiazole for PY5-BT. The four PSMA films possess narrower bandgaps of 1.43-1.45 eV. Interestingly, PY5-BTZ shows a higher-lying LUMO energy level of -3.72 eV (-3.76 eV for PY5-2TZ, -3.75 eV for PY5-PZ, and -3.78 eV for PY5-BT) and a stronger absorbance of 1.5 x 10(5) cm(-1) (1.4 x 10(5) cm(-1) for the other three PSMAs). The all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs) with PY5-BTZ as the polymer acceptor and PBDB-T as the polymer donor exhibit a peak power conversion efficiency of 14.82% with a high open circuit voltage of 0.92 V, which benefits from the higher-lying LUMO level and stronger absorbance of the PY5-BTZ polymer acceptor. The results indicate that introducing weak electron-withdrawing A-units and thiophene pi-bridges could be an effective approach in designing and synthesizing high-performance PSMA polymer acceptors for high-efficiency all-PSCs in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据