4.6 Review

Advances in Graphene/Inorganic Nanoparticle Composites for Catalytic Applications

期刊

CHEMICAL RECORD
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/tcr.202100274

关键词

Graphene; inorganic nanoparticles; heterogeneous catalysis; oxidation; hydrogenation

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1436-032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene-based nanocomposites with inorganic nanoparticles have high catalytic activity and are widely used in chemical transformations. Graphene and its derivatives are excellent support materials for fabricating nanocomposites due to their high surface area and variable functionalities. The ability to adjust the surface composition enhances the versatility of these nanocomposites in catalysis. This review discusses the preparation and catalytic applications of graphene/inorganic nanoparticles based nanocomposites, and highlights the interfacial electronic communication and other factors that contribute to increased catalytic efficiencies.
Graphene-based nanocomposites with inorganic (metal and metal oxide) nanoparticles leads to materials with high catalytic activity for a variety of chemical transformations. Graphene and its derivatives such as graphene oxide, highly reduced graphene oxide, or nitrogen-doped graphene are excellent support materials due to their high surface area, their extended pi-system, and variable functionalities for effective chemical interactions to fabricate nanocomposites. The ability to fine-tune the surface composition for desired functionalities enhances the versatility of graphene-based nanocomposites in catalysis. This review summarizes the preparation of graphene/inorganic NPs based nanocomposites and their use in catalytic applications. We discuss the large-scale synthesis of graphene-based nanomaterials. We have also highlighted the interfacial electronic communication between graphene/inorganic nanoparticles and other factors resulting in increased catalytic efficiencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据