4.7 Article

Strontium isotope fractionation during precipitation of strontianite in aqueous solutions as a function of temperature and reaction rate

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 587, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120625

关键词

Strontium isotope; Fractionation; Strontianite precipitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on Strontium isotope fractionation during the precipitation of strontianite revealed that the process is independent of specific precipitation rate (R*) and temperature (T) unlike calcite and aragonite. The difference in isotope composition between strontianite and bulk solution is mainly influenced by intermolecular forces in aqueous solutions and kinetic effects.
In order to study Strontium (Sr) isotope fractionation during the precipitation of strontianite (SrCO3) as a function of the specific precipitation rate (R*) and temperature (T), strontianite was precipitated at 12.5, 25.0 and 37.5 degrees C by diffusing NH3 and CO2 gases into aqueous solutions. The specific precipitation rate R* (mol/cm(2).h) for every sample was determined by applying the initial rate method. The mean isotope difference between bulk solution and precipitate (Delta Sr-88/86(strontianite-solution)) was found to be 0.279 +/- 0.005% (2 sigma(mean)) independent of both rate and temperature. Hence, Sr isotope fractionation in strontianite is completely different from that in calcite and aragonite, where a strong dependency from both rate and temperature can be observed. The latter is interpreted to reflect the competition between Sr2+ and Ca2+ ions for incorporation into the calcium carbonate crystal lattice, which is absent during the precipitation of pure strontianite. The isotope difference between strontianite and bulk solution then simply reflects the intermolecular forces in the aqueous solutions as well as the kinetic effect. The difference in the (Delta Sr-88/86(strontianite-solution) between experiments then reflects the dehydration energy of Sr ions in the adsorption layer of SrCO3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据