4.7 Article

Speciation and polymerization in a barium silicate glass: Evidence from 29Si NMR and Raman spectroscopies

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 586, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120611

关键词

polymerization; silicate melt structure; disproportionation; Raman spectroscopy; 29Si NMR spectroscopy; Qn speciation

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2016/18567-5, 2017/06649-0, 2013/07793-6]
  2. CNPq
  3. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raman and NMR spectroscopies have been used to study the polymerization of silicate glasses, with this study showing that the structural interpretation of 40BaO-60SiO(2) glass was robust by combining evidence from both techniques. The distribution of Q(n) and composition of the glass support the stoichiometry Ba0.66SiO2.66, indicating a consistent level of polymerization.
Raman and NMR spectroscopies have long been employed in pursuing quantitative relationships between polymerization of silicate glasses and melts. However, varying assumptions and ambiguities have often meant structural models vary significantly depending on the probe used. This study investigates a 40BaO center dot 60SiO(2) glass to determine its polymerization using static and MAS Si-29 NMR, and Raman spectroscopies to construct a coherent structural interpretation. The challenges and advantages of each technique are discussed as the structural model of 40BaO-60SiO(2) glass required partial evidence derived from each of these spectroscopies. The Raman scattering cross sections for Q(2) and Q(3) were found to be 0.85 and 1.22, respectively. The Q(n) distribution was shown to be 3, 35, 57, 6% (+/- 4%) for Q(1) to Q(4), respectively. This distribution yields a polymerization consistent with the stoichiometry, Ba0.66SiO2.66, having a O:Si ratio of 2.66. The agreement between all Q(n) distributions, the composition, the polymerization, and equilibrium constants strongly indicate that this structural interpretation is robust.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据