4.6 Article

Identification and dynamic properties of clusters for Geldart group B particles in a circulating fluidized bed

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117265

关键词

Particle clusters; Cluster identification criterion; Geldart group B particles; Circulating fluidized bed

资金

  1. National Key Research Plan [2019YFE0102100]
  2. Huaneng Group Science and Technology Research Project [HNKJ20-H50]
  3. C9 University Science and Technology Project [201903D421009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the influence of particle clusters on the gas-solid flow behavior in circulating fluidized beds through experimental measurements. The results showed a weak dependence of cluster properties on fluidization states, and proposed a modified cluster solid holdup model that has higher prediction accuracy under specific conditions.
Particle clusters have a significant influence on the gas-solid flow behavior in circulating fluidized beds (CFB). To further investigate the parametric effects of fluidization state on the characteristics of clusters for Geldart group B particles, measurements of the transient solid concentration at different axial elevations and transverse positions were conducted in a 10.3-m high CFB test rig with quartz sand. Soong's criterion and wavelet analysis were both used to specify the cluster identification threshold, and a following comparison of the two established thresholds showed that Soong's criterion was a better choice for identifying clusters. By the selected threshold, the dynamic properties of clusters at different fluidization states were determined. The results revealed a weak dependence of the properties on the fluidization states. Lastly, based on the abundant experimental data provided, a modified cluster solid holdup model with higher prediction accuracy at epsilon(s) < 0.01 was proposed. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据