4.6 Article

Systematic screening of bifunctional ionic liquid for intensifying esterification of methyl heptanoate in the reactive extraction process

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116888

关键词

Solvent screening; Ionic liquid; Bifunctional solvent; Reactive extraction; Methyl heptanoate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776074, 21861132019]
  2. 111 Project [B08021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Screening bifunctional ionic liquids can enhance the efficiency of long-chain ester formation, with evaluation of extraction and catalytic performance based on infinite dilution selectivity and pKa values. Experimental results show that the screened IL outperforms commonly used bifunctional IL in terms of long-chain ester yield and purity.
For long-chain ester formation, reactive extraction intensified by a bifunctional solvent is a proper process concept as the product ester is usually not soluble in water. To screen a bifunctional ionic liquid (IL), both extraction performance and catalytic activity are considered, taking esterification of methanol and heptanoic acid as example. Based on solute-in-IL infinite dilution activity coefficient generated from DNN-based recommender system, infinite dilution selectivity between product and reactant in ILs is adopted to evaluate extraction performance. The acid dissociation constant (pKa) obtained by quantum chemical calculation is used to evaluate the catalytic activity of ILs. The screened IL, 1-propyl-2,3-dime thylimidazol-3-ium hydrogen sulfate ([IM-3,1,1][HSO4]), has a high infinite dilution selectivity of 710.77 and pKa of 5.81. Both UNIFAC-IL calculation and experimental validation are performed to exam-ine phase splitting and reaction results. The screened IL gives higher ester yield and ester phase purity than the most commonly used bifunctional IL [BMIM][HSO4]. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据