4.6 Article

In situ reforming of lignite pyrolysis volatiles for enriching light aromatics over Ga substituted HZSM-5

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117235

关键词

Aromatics; Lignite pyrolysis; xGa/H5; Stability

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0124200]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200028]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978317]
  4. Qing Lan Project
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ga-substituted HZSM-5 was used to regulate the production of light aromatics during lignite volatiles catalytic upgrading, with xGa/H5(A) achieving high BTEXN yield. However, excessive Ga content weakened the synergistic effect between Ga species and acid sites, leading to reduced aromatic production.
HZSM-5 was hydrothermally synthesized by Ga substitution to regulate the texture properties for light aromatics such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and naphthalene (BTEXN) during the lignite volatiles catalytic upgrading process. High BTEXN yield was obtained over xGa/H5(A) (added NaOH in crystallization) and the value increased with raising the amount of Ga incorporation when the Ga content was<1.26 g. 1.26 Ga/H5(A) (1.26 g Ga(NO3)(3)) displayed the highest yield of BTEXN (29.3 mg/g-daf coal) since Ga species and acidic protons promoted the aromatization process. However, excessive Ga brought a negative effect on the production of aromatics due to the weakened synergistic effect between Ga species and acid sites of H5. Additionally, 1.26 Ga/H5(A) with the interconnected meso-micropores and moderate acidity distribution exhibited excellent reaction stability during the 6 cycle experiments. xGa/H5(A) provided a potential prospect for enhancing the BTEXN formation during catalytic upgrading of lignite pyrolysis volatiles. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据