4.6 Article

Extension of pinch analysis to targeting and synthesis of water recycling networks with multiple contaminants

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117223

关键词

Multi-contaminant Water Pinch Analysis; Process Integration; Material recycle; reuse; Network design for water recycling

资金

  1. EU [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/000 0456]
  2. Czech Republic Operational Programme Research and Development, Education, Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research, based on the SPIL project
  3. Universiti Technology Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An extended targeting and synthesis procedure using the Pinch approach has been developed for material resource conservation networks with multiple contaminants, introducing a 'polygon' rule for representing source mixing feasibility and optimizing network design through sequential Pinch Analysis.
An extended targeting and synthesis procedure using the Pinch approach has been developed for material resource conservation networks with multiple contaminants (e.g. water recycling network with multiple constraints). The Sink and Source Composite Curves (CC) are constructed for each contaminant (load vs flowrate). In this work, a 'polygon' rule is introduced for the CCs representation that illustrates the feasibility of the source mixing. The Source CCs for all the contaminants have to be shifted at least until a 'polygon' is formed around the vertices of the Sink CCs, with lines represent the edges of the Source and Sink CCs. The framework first identifies a freshwater target for each sink with Pinch Analysis based on the pre-determined source arrangement. A condition for further reduction of the freshwater is then checked with the proposed algorithm. Pinch Analysis of each sink sequentially enables the freshwater target and the optimal network design with allocated sources flowrates to be determined. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据