4.6 Article

Evaluation of an ozone diffusion process using a hollow fiber membrane contactor

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 291-303

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.002

关键词

Ozonation; Hollow fibers; Membrane contactor; Mass transfer; Acid Orange 7

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the transfer characteristics and influencing factors of ozone in bubbleless operation, finding that ozone concentration had the greatest impact on ozone transfer, followed by liquid flowrate and gas flowrate. Additionally, the effects of organic dye reactions in water on transfer, as well as the long-term impact of ozone on membrane material, were evaluated.
Conventional ozonation processes efficiently remove micropollutants in water treatment, but uncontrolled ozone dosing can produce problematic by-products. Bubbleless operation could help overcome this hurdle. To evaluate this alternative, ozonation was carried out using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hollow fiber membrane contactor. The objective was to conduct an extensive characterization of the ozone transfer in an in/out configuration. The overall mass transfer coefficient KLa was determined and was higher than in bubble columns. The transfer resistance due to the membrane was estimated to be lower than 1%. The impact of several variables (liquid flowrate, gas flowrate, and ozone concentration) on the ozone transfer was studied. Ozone concentration was the variable that most increased ozone transfer, followed by the liquid flowrate and then to a lesser extent the gas flowrate. The impact of the presence of a reaction in the water was also evaluated using an organic dye (Acid Orange 7). The Hatta number and the acceleration factor were calculated, corresponding to a reaction that took place partially in the liquid film and in the liquid bulk. Finally, the impact of ozone on membrane material over time was evaluated. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据