4.7 Article

Issues and opportunities on low-temperature aqueous batteries

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 423, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130253

关键词

Aqueous batteries; Low-temperature; Electrode materials design; Electrolyte optimization

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0901500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771094, 21835004, 21905265, 21773226]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [B12015, IRT13R30]
  4. Tianjin High-Tech [18JCZDJC31500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aqueous batteries are gaining attention for large-scale energy storage due to their safety, environmental friendliness, and low cost. However, they suffer from low discharge capacity and power density at low temperatures, limiting practical applications. Various strategies have been proposed to improve the low-temperature performance of aqueous batteries, focusing on electrode materials, electrolyte optimization, and component modification.
Aqueous batteries (ABs) have received increasing attention for large-scale energy storage owing to inherent safety, environmental friendliness, high ionic conductivity and low cost of the electrolytes. However, they display low discharge capacity and power density in low-temperature conditions, or even cannot operate normally, which severely limits their practical applications. Up to now, some strategies are reported to improve the low-temperature performance of ABs. In this review, we firstly clarify the intrinsic effect of low temperature environment on the battery from perspective of thermodynamics and kinetics. Then, the reported strategies for improving the low-temperature performance of ABs are summarized, including electrode materials design, electrolytes optimization, and modification of other components (e. g. binder, separator, and conductor). Finally, this review shares our perspectives on potential directions for further improving the low-temperature performance of ABs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据