4.7 Article

Active Co@CoO core/shell nanowire arrays as efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132226

关键词

Cobalt (II) oxide; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Core/shell nanowire arrays; Electrocatalyst; Formation mechanism

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020 M671713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a facile method to fabricate Co@CoO core/shell nanowire arrays as an efficient electrocatalyst for HER. The nanowire arrays exhibit superior catalytic activity with ultra-low overpotential in alkaline solution and excellent long-term stability, making them promising for hydrogen evolution applications.
Exploration of high-efficiency non-noble-metal-based electrocatalysts towards Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is critical for water electrolysis. In this work, we adopt a facile hydrothermal deposition plus hydrogen reduction strategy to fabricate self-supported Co@CoO core/shell nanowire arrays as a high-performance electrocatalyst for HER. The Co@CoO nanowire arrays are firmly anchored on the nickel foam substrate, forming an integrated electrode with excellent stability. The formation mechanism of the unique Co@CoO core/shell nanowire arrays is also explored. By virtue of the superior intrinsic catalytic activity of CoO shell and excellent electrical conductivity of Co core, the Co@CoO electrode exhibits significantly promoted catalytic activity for HER with an ultra-low overpotential (76 mV at 10 mA cm(-2)) in alkaline solution, which is superior to almost all the reported CoO-based electrocatalysts. Moreover, the Co@CoO electrode also yields superior long-term durability without any significant performance degradation. DFT calculations further verify the underlying mechanisms. Our proposed optimization strategy sheds light on the development of high activity earth-abundant-metal-based electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据