4.7 Article

Mn-doped ZnO microspheres as cathode materials for aqueous zinc ion batteries with ultrastability up to 10 000 cycles at a large current density

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127770

关键词

Manganese doping; Micro-sphere structure; High energy density; 10 000 cycles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51501068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing a temperature-regulation method, rough Mn-doped zinc oxide microspheres were prepared, featuring a structure rich in superfine nanoparticles and internal mesopores. This structure not only facilitates Zn2+ diffusion and alleviates stress, but also enhances electrical conductivity. Applied as a cathode material in ZIBs, the Mn-doped ZnO demonstrates excellent rate performance and cycle durability, showing potential for high energy storage applications.
Recently, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) are highly attractive due to high specific capacity of Zn, low-cost and safety, but the weak reaction kinetics and fast capacity attenuation still remain challenging. Herein, we adopt a temperature-regulation method to prepare rough Mn-doped zinc oxide microspheres. Such microsphere structure is rich in superfine nanoparticles and internal mesopores, which offers more Zn2+ diffusion channels and alleviates the stress and strain in the electrochemical process. Meanwhile, the doping of Mn into the ZnO structure can not only adjust the electronic structure, but also enhance the electrical conductivity, thereby upraising the reaction kinetics. Applied to ZIBs cathode, Mn-doped ZnO material presents appreciable rate performance, which obtains 268.1 mA h g(-1) at 1 A g(-1) and retains 163.8 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1). Most importantly, high energy density (206.9 Wh kg(-1)), power density (6896.7 W kg(-1)) and superior cycle durability (similar to 146.7% after 10 000 cycles relative to the first cycle) endow this material with more potential in energy storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据