4.4 Article

Impact of bPNA Backbone Structural Constraints and Composition on Triplex Hybridization with DNA

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100707

关键词

bPNA; DANN; peptides; secondary structures; triplexes

资金

  1. NIH [GM111995, 1R01GM143543-01]
  2. NSF [DMR 1802432]
  3. Center for RNA Biology at OSU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of amino acid composition and backbone modification on DNA binding of bifacial peptide nucleic acid (bPNA). The results demonstrate the tunability of bPNA-DNA hybrid stability through bPNA backbone structural propensities and amino acid composition.
We report herein a study on the impact of bifacial peptide nucleic acid (bPNA) amino acid composition and backbone modification on DNA binding. A series of bPNA backbone variants with identical net charge were synthesized to display either 4 or 6 melamine (M) bases. These bases form thymine-melamine-thymine (TMT) base-triples, resulting in triplex hybrid stem structures with T-rich DNAs. Analyses of 6 M bPNA-DNA hybrids suggested that hybrid stability was linked to amino acid secondary structure propensities, prompting a more detailed study in shorter 4 M bPNAs. We synthesized 4 M bPNAs predisposed to adopt helical secondary structure via helix-turn nucleation in 7-residue bPNAs using double-click covalent stapling. Generally, hybrid stability improved upon stapling, but amino acid composition had a more significant effect. We also pursued an alternative strategy for bPNA structural preorganization by incorporation of residues with strong backbone amide conformational preferences such as 4R- and 4S-fluoroprolines. Notably, these derivatives exhibited an additional improvement in hybrid stability beyond both unsubstituted proline bPNA analogues and the helically patterned bPNAs. Overall, these findings demonstrate the tunability of bPNA-DNA hybrid stability through bPNA backbone structural propensities and amino acid composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据