4.4 Article

Xanthopsin-Like Systems via Site-Specific Click-Functionalization of a Retinoic Acid Binding Protein

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100449

关键词

light-sensitive proteins; Morita-Baylis-Hillman adducts; PYP-like chromophores; site-specific reactions; synthetic xanthopsin-like proteins

资金

  1. Italian MIUR
  2. National Institute of Health [R15GM126627]
  3. MIUR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of Morita-Baylis-Hillman adducts allows for facile site-specific, irreversible, and diastereoselective click-functionalization of a lysine residue, producing an unnatural chromophore with an extended pi-system within a lipophilic binding pocket. This approach opens up the possibility of in vitro preparation of a library of synthetic proteins structurally reminiscent of xanthopsin eubacterial photoreceptors, expanding the scope of optogenetic and lab-on-a-molecule tools introduced by rhodopsin mimics.
The use of light-responsive proteins to control both living or synthetic cells, is at the core of the expanding fields of optogenetics and synthetic biology. It is thus apparent that a richer reaction toolbox for the preparation of such systems is of fundamental importance. Here, we provide a proof-of-principle demonstration that Morita-Baylis-Hillman adducts can be employed to perform a facile site-specific, irreversible and diastereoselective click-functionalization of a lysine residue buried into a lipophilic binding pocket and yielding an unnatural chromophore with an extended pi-system. In doing so we effectively open the path to the in vitro preparation of a library of synthetic proteins structurally reminiscent of xanthopsin eubacterial photoreceptors. We argue that such a library, made of variable unnatural chromophores inserted in an easy-to-mutate and crystallize retinoic acid transporter, significantly expand the scope of the recently introduced rhodopsin mimics as both optogenetic and lab-on-a-molecule tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据