4.2 Article

Modelling and optimization of the extrusion process in a snack of barley/corn and nutritional evaluation of the optimized product

期刊

CEREAL CHEMISTRY
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 556-567

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cche.10518

关键词

amino acids; barley; corn; extrusion; protein; starch

资金

  1. Catedras-CONACyT Project [1232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study optimized the extrusion process to create a snack made from a mixture of barley and corn, meeting essential amino acid requirements and improving protein digestibility. The combination of two cereals offers a novel way to supplement essential amino acids and enhance protein digestibility in snacks.
Background and objectives Most of the snacks in the market contain a single cereal and show nutritional deficiencies. The aim of the study was to optimize the conditions of the extrusion process for a snack with barley/corn mix and their physicochemical evaluation, amino acid content, protein digestibility, and resistant starch as a healthy snack. Findings The regression model indicated that the variables water absorption index, water solubility index, and hardness can be explained by the models. Expansion index showed no significant effect. The optimal conditions of the process of extrusion were feed moisture 38%, die temperature 130 degrees C, and barley/corn mix 50:50. An unflavored snack with 392.11 kcal/100 g was obtained, considering it is flavored, its estimated energy contribution is around of 446.11 kcal/100 g. The concentration of essential amino acids in the extrudate meets the requirements established by FAO/WHO/UNU for children and adolescents. Protein digestibility increased and the content of available and resistant starch was reduced. Conclusions The optimal conditions of extrusion allowed to obtain an alternative snack with the essential amino acid requirements and higher protein digestibility. Significance and novelty The combination of two cereals allows to supplement the requirement of essential amino acids and greater protein digestibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据