4.7 Article

Effect of silicon/graphite ratio and temperature on oxidation protective properties of SiC/ZrB2-SiC coatings prepared by pack cementation

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 5187-5196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.058

关键词

Coating; Pack cementation; Oxidation resistance; Thermal shock resistance; ZrB2– SiC

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51802176, 51872174, 51802178]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2019JMRH0402, 2020JMRH0503]
  3. SDUT&Zibo City Integration Development Project [2018ZBXC439]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The silicon/graphite ratio and temperature have been investigated for their effects on the preparation and properties of ZrB2-SiC coatings. A higher silicon/graphite ratio does not guarantee higher coating density, but residual silicon in the coating is beneficial for increased density and enhanced oxidation protection ability.
To investigate the silicon/graphite ratio and temperature on preparation and properties of ZrB2-SiC coatings, ZrB2, silicon, and graphite powders were used as pack powders to prepare ZrB2-SiC coatings on SiC coated graphite samples at different temperatures by pack cementation method. The composition, microstructure, thermal shock, and oxidation resistance of these coatings were characterized and assessed. High silicon/graphite ratio (in this case, 2) did not guarantee higher coating density, instead could be harmful to coating formation and led to the lump of pack powders, especially at temperatures of 2100 and 2200 degrees C. But residual silicon in the coating is beneficial for high density and oxidation protection ability. The SiC/ZrB2-SiC (ZS50-2) coating prepared at 2000 degrees C showed excellent oxidation protective ability, owing to the residual silicon in the coating and dense coating structure. The weight loss of ZS50-2 after 15 thermal shocks between 1500 degrees C and room temperature, and oxidation for 19 h at 1500 degrees C are 6.5% and 2.9%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据