4.7 Article

High-temperature interface stability of tri-layer thermal environmental barrier coatings

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 9313-9323

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.124

关键词

Thermal environmental barrier coatings (TEBCs); Y2O3 & nbsp;stabilized HfO2 & nbsp;(YSH); Ytterbium silicate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China (NSFC) [92060301, 51801008]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YWF-21-BJ-J-1034]
  3. Youth Talent Support Program of Beihang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal environmental barrier coatings (TEBCs) consisting of three layers were designed to protect ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) from hot gas and steam at 1300℃. The microstructure evolution, interface stability, and oxidation behavior of the coatings were studied, revealing the stable YSH16/YbMS interface and the formation of a reaction zone at the YbMS/Si interface.
Thermal environmental barrier coatings (TEBCs) are capable of protecting ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) from hot gas and steam. In this paper, a tri-layer TEBC consisting of 16 mol% YO1.5 stabilized HfO2 (YSH16) as thermal barrier coating, ytterbium monosilicate (YbMS) as environmental barrier coating, and silicon as the bond coating was designed. Microstructure evolution, interface stability, and oxidation behavior of the tri-layer TEBC at 1300 & DEG;C were studied. The as-sprayed YSH16 coating was mainly comprised of cubic phase and-3.4 vol% of monoclinic (M) phase. After 100 h of heat exposure, the volume fraction of the M phase increased to-27%. The YSH16/YbMS interface was proved to be very stable because only slight diffusion of Yb to YSH16 was observed even after thermal exposure at 1300 & DEG;C for 100 h. At the YbMS/Si interface, a reaction zone including a Yb2Si2O7 layer and a SiO2 layer was generated. The SiO2 & nbsp;grew at a rate of-0.039 mu m2/h in the first 10 h and a reduced rate of 0.014 mu m(2)/h in the subsequent exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据