4.7 Article

Magnetic properties and microwave absorption of Ni0.7Zn0.3A0.05Fe1.95O4 (A = La, Ce, and Nd) powders within the range of 2-18 GHz

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 20, 页码 28764-28769

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.036

关键词

Ni0; 7Zn0; Magnetic properties; Electromagnetic properties; Microwave absorption

资金

  1. Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NWPU) , China [2020-TS-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni0.7Zn0.3A0.05Fe1.95O4 powders were obtained by the sol-gel combustion technique, and the substitution of La3+, Ce3+, and Nd3+ in Ni0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 ferrite decreased the saturation magnetization while enhancing the dielectric constant, leading to improved microwave absorption performance. The substituted Ni0.7Zn0.3Ce0.05Fe1.95O4 ferrite showed the best reflection loss at -17.5 dB at 13.8 GHz, with an absorption bandwidth of 10.9 GHz, demonstrating its potential for broadband microwave absorption applications.
Ni0.7Zn0.3A0.05Fe1.95O4 (A = La, Ce, and Nd) powders were obtained by the sol-gel combustion technique. The phase composition, microstructure, and electromagnetic properties of La3+, Ce3+, and Nd3+ substituted Ni0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 were investigated. Compared with the Ni0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 ferrite, the saturation magnetization of substituted Ni0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 powders decreases due to the reduction of the super-exchange interaction by the substitution of La3+, Ce3+, and Nd3+at the Fe site. Furthermore, the enhanced dielectric constant of the substituted Ni0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4 ferrites prompts to the formation of good impedance matching and thereby improving the microwave absorption performance. The best reflection loss of Ni0.7Zn0.3Ce0.05Fe1.95O4 ferrite is -17.5 dB at 13.8 GHz, and the corresponding absorption bandwidth (RL <= 5 dB) can be achieved 10.9 GHz. These results suggested that the Ni0.7Zn0.3Ce0.05Fe1.95O4 ferrite is a potential composite for electromagnetic applications, particularly for broadband microwave absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据