4.7 Article

Copper reinforced SiAlON matrix composites produced by spark plasma sintering

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 9, 页码 13260-13270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.204

关键词

Composites; Hybrid; Fracture toughness; Wear; Spark plasma sintering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Cu particles were incorporated into the SiAlON matrix to investigate their effect on the fracture toughness, hardness, density, friction, and wear of the composites. The results showed that the fracture toughness improved with the addition of 30 vol% copper, while the hardness decreased. It was also found that some copper silicide phase formed during the sintering process. The wear rates were significantly reduced in the SiAlON matrix with 30 wt% copper content.
Cu particles (vol%. 0, 10, 20, 30) were incorporated into the alpha(1):beta(1)-SiAlON matrix to investigate its effect on fracture toughness, Vickers hardness, density, friction, and wear. The composite powders were prepared by planetary milling and sintering was carried out by spark plasma sintering at a temperature of 1600 degrees C for 10 min. The bulk density of Cu- (1):beta(1)-SiAlON hybrid composites varied between 3,2501 and 2,9547 g/cm(3), % open porosity values of composites increased with the addition of Cu. The fracture toughness showed improvement when the content of copper is 30 vol% (8,76 MPam(1/2)). On the other hand, hardness decreased from 17.6 GPa to 12.25 GPa, as expected, related to copper's low hardness value compared to the SiAlON matrix. Although the copper phase remained stable after sintering, it was determined that some of it formed copper silicide phase. In terms of wear, the use of metallic second phase as copper seems to enormous addition for SiAlONs in order to develop wear properties depending on the provided physico-mechanical properties such as high fracture toughness, self-lubrication etc., which discussed in this study. The wear rates were decimated in SiAlON matrix with the 30 wt% the optimal amount of copper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据