4.7 Article

Microchanneled biomorphous Al2O3 coated with TiO2 aerogel for photocatalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 11, 页码 15946-15950

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.136

关键词

Biomorphous ceramics; Rattan; TiO2 aerogel; Biotemplating; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. Bayerisches Hochschulzentrum fur Lateinamerika (BAYLAT/Germany)
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES/Brazil) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the preparation of biomorphic Al2O3 ceramics derived from rattan as supports for TiO2 aerogels. The TiO2 aerogel coated on the channels' walls increased the specific surface area and enhanced photocatalytic efficiency. This research provides potential applications in utilizing rattan-derived Al2O3 with TiO2 aerogel coating.
This work reports the preparation of rattan-derived biomorphic Al2O3 ceramics as supports for coating with TiO2 aerogels. The biomorphous Al2O3 samples were infiltrated with a TiO2-procusor sol, gelled and submitted to supercritical CO2 drying, which resulted in formation of a TiO2 aerogel layer on the channels' walls. Subsequent thermal treatment at 450 degrees C led to the formation of anatase and rutile. The biomorphous Al2O3 was also coated with commercial TiO2 (Degussa P25) for comparison. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the biomorphous Al2O3 maintained the original micro-anatomic features of rattan and the channels' walls were coated with TiO2 aerogel particles. Coating with TiO2 aerogel increased the specific surface area and enhanced in 60% the photocatalytic efficiency in the reduction of 4-nitrophenol when compared with P25 coating. The micro channeled hierarchical structure of rattan-derived Al2O3 allowed fluid flow and the high surface area of TiO2 aerogels ensured adsorption of molecules during chemical reactions, which increased photocatalysis efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据