4.7 Article

Preparation and textural evolution: From organosilane aerogel to SiOC aerogels

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 5468-5475

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.091

关键词

SiOC aerogel; Sol-gel; Ambient pressure drying; Pyrolysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972222]
  2. key technologies R & D program of Tianjin [17YFZCGX00600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SiOC aerogels were prepared using sol-gel method and ambient pressure drying technology. The aerogels exhibited excellent properties with high porosity, high compressive strength, and low thermal conductivity. A new concept of gases truing was proposed to explain the microstructure evolution of the aerogels during pyrolysis, providing insights for the preparation of high-performance SiOC aerogels.
Generally, SiOC aerogels are prepared utilizing the high-temperature pyrolysis of polyorganosiloxanes or polycarboorganosilanes in an inert gas atmosphere. However, the crosslinking and drying of the precursor rely on the catalysts of noble metal, the equipment of autoclave, and the technology of supercritical drying, which limit the batch production of SiOC aerogel. In this work, the SiOC aerogels were prepared via pyrolysis of methyltrimethoxysilane/triethoxyvinylsilane (MTMS/VTES) organosilane aerogel precursor (O-SAP), which was synthesized using sol-gel method and ambient pressure drying technology. Under the temperature of 1500 degrees C, the SiOC aerogel exhibited excellent properties with high porosity (80%), high compressive strength (11.52 MPa), and low thermal conductivity (0.08 W m K-1), which overweighed most state-of-the-art SiOC aerogels. More significantly, a new concept of gases truing was firstly proposed to explain the microstructure evolution of O SAP during pyrolysis. This paper is expected to provide insights for the preparation of high-performance SiOC aerogels, with promising applications in heat insulation and anode material of Li-ion battery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据