4.7 Article

Influence of helium ion radiation on the nano-grained Li2TiO3 ceramic for tritium breeding

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 20, 页码 28357-28366

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.253

关键词

Tritium breeding; Nano-grain; Lithium titanium oxide; Helium ion; Radiation tolerance

资金

  1. National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program [2014GB125002]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province [2018GZ0530]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21130019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization and analysis of nano- and coarse-grained Li2TiO3 tritium breeder ceramic plates after radiation showed that nano-grained Li2TiO3 exhibited more stable crystal structure, smoother surface, and lower defect concentration compared to coarse-grained Li2TiO3.
Lithium titanium oxide (Li2TiO3) tritium breeder ceramic plates with nano- and coarse-grain size were fabricated. The preparation methods contained CTAB-modifying precursor, combining dry-pressing with isostatically cold-pressing, and calcinating at optimized sintering temperature in turn. Then their properties were characterized after radiation by 280 keV helium (He+) ion. Extensive characterization analyses were performed to reveal the changes in nano-grained and coarse-grained Li2TiO3 after radiation. They contained glancing angle X-ray diffraction (GIXRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), electron spin resonance (ESR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed as follows, GIXRD peak position of the nano-grained Li2TiO3 was more stable than the coarse-grained Li2TiO3 after radiation. Nano-grained Li2TiO3 was less rough and swollen than the coarse-grained one after radiation. Nano-grained Li2TiO3 had more excellent structural stability and less defect concentration of E'-center after radiation. As a result, nano-grained Li2TiO3 might have much better radiation tolerance than the coarse-grained one by comparing characterization results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据