4.7 Article

Reactions between magnesia-chrome refractories and copper converter slags: Corrosion behavior and prevention by Fe-rich layer formation

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 14813-14824

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.018

关键词

Magnesia-chrome refractory; Copper converter slag; Corrosion behavior; Thermodynamic simulation; Fe-rich layer

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China [2019YFC1908401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51974025]
  3. Guangxi Innovation-driven Development Project [AA18242042-1]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-MP-20-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the corrosion behavior of magnesia-chrome refractories immersed in copper converter slags at different temperatures. It proposes a novel approach to prolong the lifetime of the furnaces based on the understanding of the corrosion mechanism.
Magnesia-chrome refractories act as a lining for electric furnaces when valuable metals are recovered from copper converter slags. However, the lifetime of refractories does not exceed six months. To address the leakage problem, the corrosion behavior of a magnesia-chrome refractory immersed in a copper converter slag at different temperatures was investigated by adopting static corrosion test. The thermodynamic simulations of solubility and reactions of the slag with the refractory were first conducted. The laboratory corroded samples showed that Fe and Si penetrated the refractory material, resulting in material dissolution and reactive corrosions. Meanwhile, an Fe-rich layer formed at the slag-refractory interface which could prevent further corrosion. Given the Fe3O4 content, 1300 degrees C was concluded as the optimal temperature to facilitate the formation of the protective layer. The laboratory findings were in agreement with the simulation well. On the basis of the corrosion behavior, this study proposed a novel approach that prolongs the lifetime of furnaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据