4.7 Article

Recent progress in superabsorbent polymers for concrete

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106648

关键词

Admixture (D); Cement paste (D); Freezing and thawing (C); Internal curing (not categorized); Kinetics (A); Mechanical properties (C); Permeability (C); Polymers (D); Pore solution (B); Rheology (A); Self-sealing; self-healing (not categorized); Shrinkage (C); Transport properties (C); Workability (A)

资金

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [12J3620N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientific interest in superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) used in conjunction with cement-based building materials has shifted towards polymer physico-chemical topics, focusing on absorption/desorption kinetics, retention of absorbed liquid, and related principles. The effects of SAPs in concrete include modifying rheology, internal curing, self-sealing and self-healing of cracks, and enhancing freezing-and-thawing durability. Recent research also explores reducing fire spalling and promoting plant growth on green wall facades using SAPs.
Scientific interest on superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) in conjunction with cement-based building materials has widened from mostly engineering aspects towards polymer physico-chemical topics over the past years. Here, we focus on the relationships between absorptivity in terms of absorption/desorption kinetics and retention of the absorbed liquid and the polymer physico-chemical principles. Based on such understanding, use and effects of SAPs in concrete are outlined and explained mechanistically. They comprise modifying rheology, internal curing to mitigate plastic and autogenous shrinkage, self-sealing and self-healing of cracks, and improvement of freezing-and-thawing durability. Recent topics such as reduction of fire spalling and enhanced growth of plant species on green wall facades are also explored for advancing the applications of SAPs in cement-based materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据