4.7 Article

Nano/micromechanical characterisation and image analysis on the properties and heterogeneity of ITZs in geopolymer concrete

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106677

关键词

Geopolymer concrete; Interfacial transition zone (ITZ); Heterogeneity; Characterisation; Image analysis

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DE150101751, IH150100006, IH200100010, LE210100019]
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, Australia
  3. Australian Research Council [LE210100019] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the heterogeneity and properties of ITZs in geopolymer concrete, revealing that the gel-related phases at the top and bottom boundaries have higher mechanical properties. A strategy involving polished aggregates, rapid scratch, and statistical analysis was proposed for investigating complex ITZs within a reasonable testing duration.
Heterogeneity of interfacial transition zones (ITZs) is a key factor for the properties and failure mechanism of geopolymer concrete. The nano/microscale properties and heterogeneity of the ITZs (the top, bottom and lateral interfaces) prepared by encompassing polished aggregates in the modelled fly ash-based geopolymer concrete were statistically investigated in this study. The nanoindentation and nanoscratch results show that the nano/ micromechanical properties of the gel-related phases of ITZs at the top and bottom boundaries are higher than the corresponding ones at the lateral boundaries and bulk paste. The mechanism of the better properties of ITZs at the top and bottom boundaries is unveiled based on quantitative image analysis of the amount, diameter and proportion distribution of fly ash particles. A strategy of controlling heterogeneity of ITZs and using polished aggregates, rapid scratch and statistical analysis is proposed to investigate more complicated ITZs within acceptable testing duration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据