4.7 Article

Water transport properties of virtual fractal porous media: Implications for the unsaturated transport properties of cement-based materials

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106613

关键词

Pore size distribution; Adsorption; Permeability; Fractal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cement-based materials are increasingly recognized as fractal materials, with fractal scaling laws used to describe the pore size distribution. This study generated virtual fractal porous media based on bundles of parallel cylindrical pores, and estimated their capillary curve and permeability using theoretical and numerical approaches. The results suggest that the van Genuchten equation, although lacking a physical basis, contains fractal information, but may not perfectly fit capillary curves and could introduce errors in inverse analysis. Additionally, there appears to be a relationship between intrinsic permeability and the van Genuchten pressure parameter.
Cement-based materials are more and more recognized as fractal materials. From a practical point of view, fractality means that the pore size distribution can be described using fractal scaling law (i.e. power functions). Here, the simplest scaling law making use of a single fractal dimension was used to generate simple and virtual fractal porous media (based on bundles of parallel cylindrical pores). The capillary curve and permeability (relative and intrinsic) of the virtual porous media were then estimated through theoretical and numerical approaches. The results show that: (1) although bereft of any physical basis, van Genuchten equation bears some fractal information; (2) although highly flexible, van Genuchten equation fails to perfectly fit the capillary curves and can thus generate error in inverse analysis (for intrinsic permeability evaluation) and (3) there seems to be a relation between the intrinsic permeability and van Genuchten pressure parameter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据