4.7 Review

A review: Material and structural properties of UHPC at elevated temperatures or fire conditions

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104212

关键词

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC); Spalling behavior; Spalling mechanism; Elevated temperatures; Fire conditions

资金

  1. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, through Mid-America Transportation Center [00059709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UHPC has higher strength and durability compared to NSC and HSC, but is prone to damage under high temperatures and fire conditions. Limited research and debates exist regarding the behavior of UHPC in such conditions, calling for exploration of new mechanisms to enhance its fire resistance.
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) shows high tensile strength, compressive strength, and durability compared to normal strength concrete (NSC). However, high compactness, low permeability, and absence of capillary pores might reduce the spalling resistance of UHPC under elevated temperatures and fire conditions compared to NSC and high strength concrete (HSC). There are limited studies on the UHPC at elevated temperatures and fire loading in both material and structural applications. Basic understanding stems from the extension of NSC and HSC under elevated temperatures, although some debates still exist among different mechanisms. As UHPC has various constituents and high strengths, the mechanisms for NSC and HSC might not be suitable for understanding the complicated behavior of UHPC at elevated temperatures with spalling behavior. Also, the UHPC fire resistance improvement is needed as more applications use UHPC in new and existing structures. Therefore, this study reviews the recent advancements in the behavior of UHPC under elevated temperatures and provides new emerging insights on the UHPC mechanism of fire performance. Some strategies for enhancing the high-temperature performance of UHPC are suggested based on the existing understandings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据