4.7 Article

Non-freezing water sorbed on microcrystalline cellulose studied by high-resolution thermogravimetric analysis

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 28, 期 16, 页码 10117-10125

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04189-8

关键词

Interaction water-cellulose; Thermogravimetric analysis; Bound water; Activation energy

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. CNPq [03847/2019-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the nature of water-cellulose interactions is crucial for grasping cellulose properties and developing new processing approaches. Through high-resolution thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), researchers identified three types of non-freezing water using the auto stepwise method, providing new insights into water-cellulose interactions that traditional techniques like DSC may not detect. Activation energy for strongly bound water desorption and cellulose degradation energy were estimated using the Ozawa-Flynn-Wall method.
Knowing the nature of water-cellulose interactions is a key factor in understanding cellulose properties and developing new processing strategies. The emergence of new advanced materials based on nanocelluloses requires more precise methods to study these systems. Here we described the study of water-cellulose interaction by high-resolution thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), comparing dynamic and auto stepwise methods. Auto stepwise method was able to identify with precision three different types of non-freezing water, which we denoted as, (I) weakly bound water, (II) intermediate and (III) strongly bound water. The Ozawa-Flynn-Wall method was used to estimate the activation energy of strongly bound water desorption, E-a average = 50.45 kJ.mol(-1) and the cellulose degradation energy, E-a average = 143.18 kJ.mol(-1). The results obtained provide a new knowledge about the interaction between water and cellulose since other techniques such as DSC are not sensitive to non-freezing bound water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据